Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
BPBPBPEvernotePhotPeachSlideShow!!!!Essay on Overload!!
BP12 2009123 WatchKnowEssay
BP#7 Essay
Monday, December 21, 2009
BP#14 2009123 Peer Review Becky Ward
Ward Becky - Peer Review
TJ Pendergast
Full Sail University
Ward Becky - Peer Review
In BP 6, Anti – Teaching essay, Becky makes some salient points concerning her doubt about new technology being the savior of education.
“As Michael Wesch put it in his article, significance is the problem. Students absolutely need to see the significance and purpose in each one of their classes.” (http://beckyward77.blogspot.com/)
Becky via Michael Wesch’s video is referring to the content of the learning experience. Michael Wesch’s admonishment to pay attention to the significance of what we are teaching our students to learn is critical. Becky appears to understand this argument.
Becky’s BP #4 supports her proposition that learning math needs to connect to the real world whenever possible. This particular web toll does that. It is also a very timely tool for these particular recessionary times. (http://www.walletproof.com/) Teaching her students how to balance a check book offers a critical skill that will transfer over to other applications in the real world, “paying the rent/mortgage, car payment, car insurance, school loans, groceries, utilities, gasoline, just every day expenses in general.” (http://beckyward77.blogspot.com/2009/11/bp42009121web-20-tools.html)
In BP3, Google Reader, Becky presents the book, 7 Habits of Highly Effective Teens, by Sean Covey. She discusses the concern that teachers have about students not having the know -how when it comes to organizing the work. Unfortunately Becky is experiencing an “Administration glitch, “Unfortunately, our district could only afford the book, but not the workbook that goes along with it. Therefore, I am trying to find ideas of projects that I can do that will help my students see how they could personally use the 7 habits.”
BP13 2009123 Peer Review - Kenny McLaughin
McLaughlin Peer Review
TJ Pendergast
Full Sail University
McLaughlin Peer Review
In BP #5. Kenny delves into the relevant applications of visual media as a learning tool for his students. He posts the following objectives:
Objectives:
- Increased Media Literacy Skills
- Practice of Professional Skills
o Cyber Etiquette
o Interpersonal skill development
o Job readiness skill development
o 21st Century Technologies skill development
(http://kingkenny3skingdom.blogspot.com/)
These objectives help the reader to frame the following information by relating Kehy’s comments and points of view to the stated objectives. The following example demonstrates this point.
“Classroom learning environments can create a news show on a unit of study, weekly, and even a daily practice of live broadcasting each morning, afternoon, or evening.
Materials needed:
- Digital Camera
- imovies
- Internet access”
(http://kingkenny3skingdom.blogspot.com/2009/12/bp52009122discovering-web-20-tools.html)
This particular example clearly relates to all six objectives. The inclusion of the required materials is a good thought allowing prospective educators to do research into the ease and availability of these particular tools in their school districts.
BP#3 Anti-Teaching is still in development. Based on Kenny’s blog, this is most likely a case of reflection as opposed to procrastination. This particular assignment calls for some deep, critical thinking. I look forward to reading his reflection on this scenario.
BP 17 2009123 Tool#6 Slidesharedemo
Sunday, December 20, 2009
BP12 2009123 WatchKnow
Friday, December 18, 2009
Posted responses to other blogs
Posted responses to other blogs:
1. Tersee, Nice one minute message. Music is great. Performs like a trailer should! I am ready for the movie to begin bout the six presidents
2. E. I like Timerime. I will look into it further for my adult students too. Thanks
3. Louria: Nice video. I need to explore your method of writing a story, Not familiar with this technique
4 Karen, nice one minute demo. Love the music. I will do some research on this web tool.
5. Interesting movie idea. I am not sold on second life or other "avatar" tools. I'll check this one out to see if it is more applicable to the online course I am developing. Thank for the idea.
6. I'm convinced. I will research Toxbox. Face to Face collaboration in real time via the internet. I am looking at a few of these web 2.o tools. Thanks for another alternative
7. Becky: Will do! Any age sounds promising. I teach dislocated workers in search of new career paths. I'll have them try CIS Thanks
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Sunday, December 13, 2009
BPExtra Curricular Elluminate Essay 12/13/09
Elluminate (http://www.elluminate.com/) offers a similar service as Wimba. Viterbo only has the chat room in Blackboard. The Elluminate platform offers a more robust set of options including a white board for visual presentation such as Keynote and PowerPoint. The student can either participate via microphone and headset or by typing in the dialogue box. Presentations can be recorded for review or for the student who cannot attend due to a schedule conflict. Part of the curriculum is a team visual presentation their final Global Sustainability Project. A team of evaluators will observe the presentations. After each presentation there will be a question and answer session. The evaluators will offer suggestions regarding necessary revisions to the presentations. The students will be given a second time to present the revisions. An option for the utilization of Elluminate is to offer a blended presentation with a live Viterbo student body audience. The audience would view the recorded or live Industry Expert chat before the beginning of breakout sessions. The breakout sessions would be blend of on ground participants and online participants dialoging via Elluminate. A PDF is attached for your convenience.
(http://www.elluminate.com/whitepapers/Best_Practices_for_Hosting_Blended_Events.pdf)
BpExtra Curricular Essay - Open Carbon12/13/09
Open Carbon (http://www.opencarbon.com/)
Slogan is, “Open Lectures from Industry Experts. Free of Carbon-Free of Charge.”
Here is the biography of one of the Industry Experts.
Mary Ellen Mika, LEED-AP, C.P.M., is Manager of Environment & Energy within the Steelcase Supply Chain Management department. She leads global sustainability efforts for the department, including “green supplier” programs, assisting with materials chemistry and life cycle analysis efforts, and is responsible for fuel and electricity purchases for Steelcase North America, including renewable energy pursuits. She assists suppliers to Steelcase throughout the world to support efforts to lead the office furniture industry in providing the most sustainable products. She gives presentations on supply chain sustainability issues throughout the world and is currently co-chairing the West Michigan Sustainable Purchasing Consortium. She has a B.S. in Biochemistry, an M.A. in Counseling Psychology and over 20 years of experience in the environmental field.
One of the challenges with the new online Servant Leadership & Global Sustainability course is to demonstrate the advantages of moving beyond Blackboard. The college has little experience in online other than the CMS, Blackboard. The discussion of the integration of a personal leaning environment begins this January with a course launch date in March 2010. An orientation day (hopefully two days) will be held in early January. Part of the orientation will be the demonstration of the integration of CMS and PLE. Viterbo will be contacting members of the Open Carbon team asking them to partner with us with the objective of having them be our Industry Experts for a one-hour lecture/dialogue using Elluminate. Viterbo will also integrate many of the free webinars located on the site. I am uploading one example for your review.
BP Extra Curricular Leapfrog 2.0 Essay
The leapfrog website (http://www.leapfrog.com) is designed to assist learning organizations to create their curriculum using the wide range of leapfrog leaning products. In the Leapfrog Schoolhouse, there are sections for parents, teachers, and educators. Parents are shown how to register their children for a personal learning pathway that measures their success. There are tabs for all age groups including one for pre-school. The teacher’s tab leads to free webinars and a video demonstration on how to best use Leapfrog learning tools. The Educator Resource tab includes grants, professional development, teacher’s lounge, research, and success stories.
Part of the orientation for the Hands Across the World pre-school teachers will be to study the research, white papers, and success stories. They will also be responsible for opening a Leapfrog account for each child.
Leapfrog offers curriculum for all ages in their LeapTrack Assessment and Instruction System. The pre-k package includes basic interactive games for developing simple reading and math skills. The k-5 includes educational software applicable to the leapfrog computer. The following is an example of a Leapfrog research paper.
Effectiveness Study
Los Angeles Unified School District
Students Using LeapFrog SchoolHouse Literacy Center Program
Realize 74% Gain in Key Early Literacy Skills
Abstract
In a study conducted in three Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) schools, students
who participated in the LeapFrog SchoolHouse Literacy Center program outperformed
students in the control group by 37% in key reading predictor tests. Prekindergarten
students using the LeapFrog SchoolHouse Literacy Center made a 74% gain in early
reading skills, surpassing those children who received only the standard district literacy
program materials.
The School Readiness Language Development Program within the LAUSD participated in a scientifically
based research study designed to measure the effectiveness of the LeapFrog SchoolHouse early literacy
program, The Literacy Center. The Literacy Center is a research-based curriculum that combines
multisensory technology with direct instruction and practice in phonemic awareness and other key early
literacy skills.
Students’ early literacy skills were measured in the fall and, after using The Literacy Center program in
class, in the spring. Results reveal statistically significant gains for those students who received
The Literacy Center (74% gain in early literacy skills) compared to students in the control group who
received the standard district literacy materials (37% gain in early literacy skills). Early literacy skills were
measured through letter-word identification (Woodcock Johnson III), blending sounds (Comprehensive
Test of Phonological Processing), and phonemic awareness (LEAPDESK Assessment). There is ample
evidence that early literacy skills are key predictors of future reading engagement and success.
Sample
Three LAUSD schools with half-day Prekindergarten classrooms were chosen by the district. Forty-five
percent (45%) of the children were girls, and 55% were boys. There were 137 children (68 treatment,
69 control) participating in this study, and their average age was 52.5 months at the beginning of
September 2001. Forty percent (40%) of the children spoke English as their primary language and 10%
were bilingual in the fall of 2001. Fifty-seven percent (57%) of the children were Hispanic, 22%
Caucasian, 12% African-American, and 6% Asian-American.
Method
Twelve classrooms at the three LAUSD schools made up the age- and gender-matched LeapFrog
SchoolHouse (treatment) and control groups. The existing district-wide literacy program was Creative
Curriculum. The LeapFrog SchoolHouse treatment group used The Literacy Center in addition to
Creative Curriculum, while the control group only used Creative Curriculum. Assessments were
conducted in English at three points throughout the 2001–2002 school year (October, January, and
May). An index of key reading skills was computed by summing the raw scores for the Woodcock
Johnson III (letter-word identification), The Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (blending
sounds), and LEAPDESK Assessment (phonemic awareness).
Results
Pre- and post-test results on this composite index of key reading skills demonstrate that students who
received The Literacy Center instruction in class performed 37% better (74% gain vs. 37% gain) on tests
of key reading predictors than students in the control group.
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Control
(n = 69)
LeapFrog SchoolHouse
(n = 68)
20.7
15.1 16.5
28.7
Fall scores
Spring scores
Scores on Key Reading Predictor Tests
at Beginning and End of School Year
Conclusion:
This LAUSD study found a statistically significant difference in performance on key reading skills
between the Prekindergarten students using The Literacy Center and the Prekindergarten students who
used only district curriculum materials. Those children who used The Literacy Center outperformed their
peers by 37%. The implications of these results are critical because early literacy skills are highly
predictive of future reading success. Every expert at the White House Summit on Early Childhood
Cognitive Development (July 2001) stressed that reading is the keystone for both academic and life
success. The Literacy Center program includes research-based, multisensory instruction and practice with
essential pre-reading skills, and has been effective in thousands of classrooms nationwide. Mean Raw Score
Max. =
78)
© 2001-2003 LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
74% gain*
* LeapFrog SchoolHouse
group outperformed control
group by 37%
A226
(http://www.leapfrogschool.com/do/efficacyStudyDetail?name=lausdeffectivestudy)
Saturday, December 12, 2009
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Blog Responses
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
BP 10: 2009122Peer Review - Martinez, Yesenia
Martinez, Yesenia Peer Review
TJ Pendergast
Full Sail University
Martinez, Yesenia Peer Review
Yesenia presents her web 2.0 tools with clarity and depth of information. Her presentation regarding Slideshow is an good example of how to post the relevant information concerning the application of this tool for both the teacher and student (http://yesenia-martinez.blogspot.com/2009/12/bp13-2009121researching-and-blogging.html)
I would first implement Slideshare in my classroom by creating a few presentations so that my students could see how the presentations look and they could become accustomed to the tool, then I would ask them how they like the look of the presentation.
(BP #13 http://yesenia-martinez.blogspot.com/)
Yesenia includes a concen that appears in almost all student work. This is the issue of relating the application of the web 2.0 tools to the school administration in order to get approval. The either implied or explicit tone suggests that this id not any eacy thing to do.
“The only thing I will have to make sure of is that it is fully accessible on my district's network.” (BP #13 http://yesenia-martinez.blogspot.com/)
In Yesenia’s BP 11, she presents an excellent example of the application of a web 20 tool in her classroom.
The first tool I found which I absolutely love is one I found on classtools.net. It is a resource for creating Venn Diagrams. The service is free to use and quite simple to manage as well. The best part about the tool is that you can host the tool on your teacher website or blog. In science I use venn diagrams very frequently to compare and contrast as this is one of Bloom's higher order thinking skills. I was amazed at the simplicity of the use of this tool! You can make out questions for students and have them complete them and the rest of the diagram or they can create the entire assignment per your instructions. You have the option of selecting either a two or three circle template. As I stated before, I use venn diagrams to compare and contrast often and can see so many possibilities with this tool! We recently completed Weathering and Erosion and compared and contrasted the differences between physical and chemical weathering. We are now moving onto the types of cycles such as the water, carbon dioxide and nitrogen cycles. When we finish covering each of these, I could use this template to compare all three! I know that my students would be very happy to see a change in the paper form of doing the venn diagrams they are used to using in my classroom. I also have a large venn diagram that I use with index cards and I could also use it as a supplement to having my own version of a completed template of whatever I assign my students possibly on a projector for reference. I can't wait to begin using this tool this week.( http://yesenia-martinez.blogspot.com/2009/12/bp11-2009121researching-and-blogging.html).
In BP 10. Yessica presents an effective video trailer on how web 2.0 Toxbox csn bre applied to the middle school science classroom. The video touches on all key advantages. The visuals of the students paired with her narration get the point across. It is engaging and encourages the viewer to further investigate ToxBox. (http://yesenia-martinez.blogspot.com/2009/12/bp10-2009121reflective-media-asset.html)
BP 9 Flikr lesson
Monday, December 7, 2009
Blog responses
Snowkedi
1. I love this site. The organization i work with is looking for good website for children. I am going to recommend this one
2. I never thought of using a blog for language development. My wife teaches English as a Second Language to Somali refugees. I will work with her trying this out. Great website. Nice blog
Vandy
1. I like this concept. A media journal could work well with out Somali pre-school children. hen they first arrive, they and their family fear the camera. We have discovered that it is cultural not faith based. I am wondering if we help them first take photos of objects then slowly move to portraits, this might help. BTW-Yes our annual Thanksgiving dinner is in honor of our new refugees. Photos coming t Flickr tomorrow.
Becyward
1. Joan, I love Photo Peach! I need to explore this further. Just played Where in the World. Great!
BP Media Literacy
Media Literacy
Literacy
The United Nations Educational Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) defines literacy as being having the “ability to identify, understand, interpret, create, communicate, compute and use printed and written materials associated with varying contexts.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literacy)
Media
Media is “In communication, media (singular medium) are the storage and transmission channels or tools used to store and deliver information or data. It is often referred to as synonymous with mass media or news media, but may refer to a single medium used to communicate any data for any purpose”
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_(communication).
Media literacy might be defined as one’s ability to identify the meaning of the symbols presented in the data, interpret those symbols, and create a new reality or modify an existing reality.
Reality
Reality is, “in everyday usage, means "the state of things as they actually exist."[1] Literally, the term denotes what is real; in its widest sense, this includes everything that is, whether or not it is observable or comprehensible.”
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality)
It appears rather easy until one focuses on the “whether it is observable or comprehensible.” Viterbo U. is about to launch its first course in Global Sustainability. There are those who do not believe in global warming. Is it that they have solid evidence to refute those who believe otherwise or is that they are media illiterate?
Metaphor
The usual definition for metaphor is. “Figure of Speech.” A metaphor is a figure of speech concisely expressed by comparing two things, saying that one is the other.[
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor)
Perhaps it is more than that. Media plus Metaphor might be defined as a, “Figure of Meaning.”
Global Warming has become a media metaphor. It is saying many things, comparing multiple things that have to do with the survival of our planet, the survival of the human species.
Media Literacy might also be considered a media metaphor. In order to be truly media literate, one might have to be competent in all the multi-intelligences.
This would mean that multi-intelligence is also a metaphor representing the holistic nature of intelligence. No one is mono-intelligent.
Here are a few sites I found interesting concerning media literacy.
Media literacy URL’s
http://www.medialit.org/reading_room/arti
cle540.html
Welcome!
The Media Literacy Online Project and
the Media Literacy Review are no
longer maintained as Internet sites.
Both served their purpose and now,
with so many excellent resources
online, it has come time to close both
projects. We are keeping this single
page updated as a gateway to
resources educators find of value.
A number of media education
organizations have become available
since the Media Literacy Online
Project was started in 1994. You are
encourage to visit and become
familiar with these organizations.
Action Coalition for Media Education
(ACME) ACME is a network of
educators, students, health
professionals, journalists, mediamakers,
parents, activists, and other
citizens joined as a member supported,
independent, nonprofit
continental educational coalition.
Alliance for a Media Literate America
(AMLA) The goal of the AMLA is to
stimulate growth in media literacy
education in the United States by
organizing and providing national
leadership, advocacy, networking,
and information exchange.
Center for Media Literacy (CML) A
pioneer in its field, the Center for
Media Literacy (CML) is a nonprofit
educational organization that provides
leadership, public education,
professional development and
educational resources nationally.
Jesuit Communication Project (JCP)
The Jesuit Communication Project
provides a variety of resources and
services for teachers, parents, church
groups, school boards, students, and
other interested groups. The goal is
to encourage, promote, and develop
Media Education across Canada
Media Awareness Network The Media
Awareness Network (MNet), home to
one of the world’s most
comprehensive collections of media
education and Internet literacy
resources.
Media Literacy Clearing House. A
comprehensive site with informational
resources of value to educators.
National Telemedia Council The
National Telemedia Council is a
national nonprofit organization that
has been promoting the concept of
media literacy for five decades.
http://www.mediaeducationweek.ca/downl
oads/Media_Education.pdf
Sunday, December 6, 2009
BP 8 Researching 2.0 Tools
BP9 2009122 Flickr Lesson Plan
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
BP 6 2009121 Anti Teaching
CMS
Course Management Systems have been a part of formal education from the first time a teacher prepared to teach. The word curriculum comes from the Latin meaning to run a course (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curriculum). As a teacher prepares to teach he/she has a set of learning objectives in mind that relate to the chosen topic. These objectives may or may not be clearly defined. In fact, they may be tacit at first. The teacher may only have a sense that something needs to be learned and therefore needs to be taught. The belief is that whatever that learning is, it cannot be left to the whims of hit or miss experience. Perhaps the first CMS was the campfire where the storyteller told the story to the children who learned to recite the story and take the lesson of the story to heart and mind. Another example of early CMS is the one room school house.
(http://www.ronsaari.com/stockImages/schoolhouses/oneRoomSchoolhouseInteriorClintonNJ.php)
The formalization of curricula requires a place or platform to support the learning. The teacher has an intention, intentional curriculum. It defines what the teacher imagines will happen when the curriculum is introduced to the student. Applied curriculum defines what actually takes place during the learning time. The actualized curriculum is what the student actually learns and takes away from the curriculum managed system. The virtual CMS platforms serve the same purpose. They are designed to support the intentional curriculum, the applied curriculum, and the actualized curriculum.
PLE
Personal Learning Environments are more ancient then curriculum management systems. The date back to the first moment human beings reflected upon their position in the world. First Person learning environments had to do with survival. The evolution of the human person moved from survival skills to symbolic language. The meaning of meaning and the reflection of self took root in the Neocortex.
Human Persons reflected upon the unseen as well as the seen. Reality was reshaped again and again. Yet, humans continue to need a personal learning environment in order to survive and thrive. The personal learning environment for Buddha was the middle path and a seat under the Bodhi Tree. The personal learning environment for Shakespeare was the Globe Theater and his writing desk. The personal learning environment for Sister Theresa was the Poor of India and a private place to pray. There is fluency to PLE’s. Humans tend to flow to and from private space to social space. An effective curriculum management system will support that flow.
No matter what the CMS-PLE relationship, it will only be deemed effective if it enhances the life on the Human Persons participating in the learning experience. Perhaps the equation should be
CMS-PLE-RLE:
Curriculum Management System-Personal Learning Environment – Real Life Experience.
2.0
2.0 applications is an advancement allowing the student to participate in the learning experience. Ironically it is a way to get back to a time when the learning distance between teacher and student was closer than it is today. The intimacy of storyteller to audience was critical for any learning to take place. Buddha’s students walked by his side. Jesus’ disciples did the same. Socrates perfected this form of CMS and paid for it with his life. The current teacher – learning model actually predates the industrial age and has its roots in the feudal system. The privileged class taught the privileged class. The democratization of education was born in the early stages of the industrial age to train the future workforce. The blossoming of colleges in America was to educate the merchant class along with the upper class. The lower class was still not in the education picture. In the early 1800’s many merchant’s sons attended private faith based colleges studying to become pastors. Most of them returned to tend their father’s business. The model of learning was still based upon the feudal system of lecture. Teachers became professors, the new high priests of knowledge. Professor priests evolved into professor bishops and professor cardinals as they moved from B.A.’s to M.A.’s to PhD’s. The ritual of tenure was created to protect their positions as the holy banks of knowledge. A priest or a teacher has no purpose if there is no parishioner in need of saving. In the case of the priest it is saving the soul. In the case of the student, the professor is saving the student from a life on ignorance and poverty. One might argue that the history of education is coming full circle. Once there were 2.0 as storyteller and story listener participated in the learning moment. It is where morals were first discussed and reflected on. The storyteller was changed as much as the story listener. No one stood outside the story. Today students are facilitators of learning before they have a “Teacher Experience.” Students who are home schooled test as high as students who attend brick & mortar schools. They are accepted at the best colleges. They are well adjusted. They have excellent social skills. They have computers and high speed internet connections. 2. 0 works because it relates to the most ancient of human dynamics, the need to participate with fellow human persons. Learning is like breathing. It is not something anyone can choose not to do. It is how it is done that matters. 2.0, CMS, PLE are not new. The technology is new. The ability to enhance the way human persons can move from information gathering to gaining knowledge to becoming innovative / creative is new. How we learn is as old as human kind.